Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 115(4): 301-5, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26256577

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is a systemic life-threatening allergic reaction that presents unique challenges for emergency care practitioners. Allergists and emergency physicians have a history of collaborating to promote an evidence-based, multidisciplinary approach to improve the emergency management and follow-up of patients with or at risk of anaphylaxis. OBJECTIVES: To review recent scientific literature about anaphylaxis, discuss barriers to care, and recommend strategies to support improvement in emergency anaphylaxis care. METHODS: An expert panel of allergists and emergency physicians was convened by the American College of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology in November 2014 to discuss current knowledge about anaphylaxis, identify opportunities for emergency practitioners and allergists to partner to address barriers to care, and recommend strategies to improve medical management of anaphylaxis along the continuum of care: from emergency medical systems and emergency department practitioners for acute management through appropriate outpatient follow-up with allergists to confirm diagnosis, identify triggers, and plan long-term care. RESULTS: The panel identified key barriers to anaphylaxis care, including difficulties in making an accurate diagnosis, low rates of epinephrine administration during acute management, and inadequate follow-up. Strategies to overcome these barriers were discussed and recommendations made for future allergist/emergency physician collaborations, and key messages to be communicated to emergency practitioners were proposed. CONCLUSION: The panel recommended that allergists and emergency physicians continue to work in partnership, that allergists be proactive in outreach to emergency care practitioners, and that easy-to-access educational programs and materials be developed for use by emergency medical systems and emergency department practitioners in the training environment and in practice.


Assuntos
Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/tratamento farmacológico , Consenso , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/métodos , Epinefrina/uso terapêutico , Triptases/sangue , Anafilaxia/epidemiologia , Erros de Diagnóstico/estatística & dados numéricos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais
2.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol ; 111(6): 529-36, 2013 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24267364

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis is life-threatening and requires rapid medical intervention. Knowledge of treatment guidelines and addressing barriers to care are essential for appropriate management. OBJECTIVE: To investigate allergists' self-reported practices in managing patients at risk for anaphylaxis, specifically in following practice parameters for diagnosis, treatment, and appropriate use of epinephrine, and to identify perceived barriers to care. METHODS: Online questionnaires were distributed to members of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology. The US physicians who self-identified as "allergist/immunologist" were eligible to participate. The first 500 completed questionnaires were analyzed. RESULTS: Nearly all (≥95%) reported adherence to practice parameters in prescribing an epinephrine auto-injector and instructing patients on its use, taking a detailed allergy history, counseling patients on avoidance measures, and educating patients on the signs and symptoms of anaphylaxis. More than 90% stated they determined the best diagnostic procedures to identify triggers and coordinated laboratory and allergy testing. Adherence to practice parameters was less robust for providing patients with written action plans and in-office anaphylaxis preparedness. Perceived barriers to care included a significant proportion of patients who were uncomfortable using epinephrine auto-injectors and inadequate knowledge of anaphylaxis among referral physicians. CONCLUSION: Allergists overwhelmingly adhere to practice parameter recommendations for the treatment and management of anaphylaxis, including appropriate use of epinephrine as first-line treatment, educating patients, and testing to diagnose anaphylaxis and identify its triggers. Opportunities for improvement include preparing staff and patients for anaphylactic events, providing written action plans, and improving knowledge of referring physicians.


Assuntos
Alergia e Imunologia , Anafilaxia , Fidelidade a Diretrizes/estatística & dados numéricos , Padrões de Prática Médica , Especialização , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Anafilaxia/terapia , Broncodilatadores/administração & dosagem , Epinefrina/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções Intramusculares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sociedades Médicas , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...